[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1354336979.2640.47.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.solarflarecom.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2012 04:42:59 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 08/13] sfc: Do not initialise buffer in
efx_alloc_special_buffer()
Currently we initialise the newly allocated buffer to all-1s, which is
important for event queues but not for descriptor queues. And since
we also do that in efx_nic_init_eventq(), it is completely pointless
to do it here.
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/nic.c | 3 ---
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/nic.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/nic.c
index 368659d..1327f29 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/nic.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/nic.c
@@ -255,9 +255,6 @@ static int efx_alloc_special_buffer(struct efx_nic *efx,
buffer->entries = len / EFX_BUF_SIZE;
BUG_ON(buffer->dma_addr & (EFX_BUF_SIZE - 1));
- /* All zeros is a potentially valid event so memset to 0xff */
- memset(buffer->addr, 0xff, len);
-
/* Select new buffer ID */
buffer->index = efx->next_buffer_table;
efx->next_buffer_table += buffer->entries;
--
1.7.7.6
--
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists