[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1211302234410.25064@dr-wily.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 23:15:50 -0500 (EST)
From: Anders Kaseorg <andersk@....EDU>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.hengli.com.au>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Wireless regression in workqueue: use mod_delayed_work() instead
of __cancel + queue
On Fri, 30 Nov 2012, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hey, again.
>
> Can you please test whether the following patch makes any difference?
>
> Thanks!
>
> diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
> index 042d221..26368ef 100644
> --- a/kernel/workqueue.c
> +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
> @@ -1477,7 +1477,10 @@ bool mod_delayed_work_on(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq,
> } while (unlikely(ret == -EAGAIN));
>
> if (likely(ret >= 0)) {
> - __queue_delayed_work(cpu, wq, dwork, delay);
> + if (!delay)
> + __queue_work(cpu, wq, &dwork->work);
> + else
> + __queue_delayed_work(cpu, wq, dwork, delay);
> local_irq_restore(flags);
> }
>
Yes. I tested that both directly on top of the bad commit, and on
v3.7-rc7, and it fixes the bug in both cases.
Thanks,
Anders
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists