netdev - Re: [PATCH 00/17] ATM fixes for pppoatm/br2684

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201212020157.qB21vZiN011233@thirdoffive.cmf.nrl.navy.mil>
Date:	Sat, 01 Dec 2012 20:57:35 -0500
From:	"Chas Williams (CONTRACTOR)" <chas@....nrl.navy.mil>
To:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	krzysiek@...lesie.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/17] ATM fixes for pppoatm/br2684

In message <1354382493.21562.347.camel@...nybook.infradead.org>,David Woodhouse writes:
>Possibly not even a bug at all, in fact =E2=80=94 GCC is fairly loose with =
>those
>warnings. But if it is a bug it's my fault. I'll take a look at that
>too. Not tonight though; I'm going out shortly and will only just manage
>the solos-pci fix.

it is not a bug, just gcc being pedantic.  gcc doesn't believe
that passing by reference it a form of initilization.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html