netdev - Re: TCP and reordering

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 01 Dec 2012 18:40:05 -0800
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Cc:	Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>,
	Vijay Subramanian <subramanian.vijay@...il.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, saku@...i.fi,
	rick.jones2@...com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: TCP and reordering

On Sun, 2012-12-02 at 01:30 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:

> Oh, of *course*... this is why my kernel would panic if I attempted to
> add BQL to BR2684. The ATM low-level driver was pushing a header onto
> the skb, and I ended up calling netdev_completed_queue() with a larger
> 'bytes' value than the one I'd called netdev_sent_queue() with. Which
> leads to a BUG(), which immediately results in a panic. A moderately
> suboptimal failure mode, when a nasty warning and disabling BQL on this
> interface might have been nicer.
> 
> However, *perhaps* it isn't so hard to get a consistent 'bytes' value.
> This version appears to work... can we use something along these lines
> in the general case? What if skb_is_nonlinear()?
> 
> This probably doesn't work for L2TP where it's going to be passed down
> the whole stack and get a new network header and everything. But for
> BR2684 is this at least a salvageable approach?
> 
> --- net/atm/br2684.c~	2012-12-01 16:35:49.000000000 +0000
> +++ net/atm/br2684.c	2012-12-02 01:18:35.216607088 +0000
> @@ -180,6 +180,11 @@ static struct notifier_block atm_dev_not
>  	.notifier_call = atm_dev_event,
>  };
>  
> +static unsigned int skb_acct_len(struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> +	return skb_tail_pointer(skb) - skb_network_header(skb);
> +}
> +
>  /* chained vcc->pop function.  Check if we should wake the netif_queue */
>  static void br2684_pop(struct atm_vcc *vcc, struct sk_buff *skb)
>  {
> @@ -191,6 +196,8 @@ static void br2684_pop(struct atm_vcc *v
>  	/* If the queue space just went up from zero, wake */
>  	if (atomic_inc_return(&brvcc->qspace) == 1)
>  		netif_wake_queue(brvcc->device);
> +
> +	netdev_completed_queue(brvcc->device, 1, skb_acct_len(skb));
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -265,6 +272,7 @@ static int br2684_xmit_vcc(struct sk_buf
>  			netif_wake_queue(brvcc->device);
>  	}
>  
> +	netdev_sent_queue(brvcc->device, skb_acct_len(skb));
>  	/* If this fails immediately, the skb will be freed and br2684_pop()
>  	   will wake the queue if appropriate. Just return an error so that
>  	   the stats are updated correctly */
> @@ -710,6 +718,7 @@ static int br2684_create(void __user *ar
>  		return err;
>  	}


Apparently this driver doesnt add any feature at alloc_netdev() time, so
it might work. (no frags in any skb)



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html