[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121203231638.GA16122@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 23:16:38 +0000
From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
To: Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, dev@...nvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] openvswitch: Use eth_mac_addr() instead of
duplicating it
On 12/03/12 at 02:55pm, Jesse Gross wrote:
> If you send patches like this to two different trees then it will
> result in merge conflicts later. Please just wait a few days; as you
> say, it's a trivial patch.
I CC'ed dev@...nvswitch.org on both patch submissions as well so if
davem merges it you will know.
It's no the lack of response to this patch but the discontinuation
of discussion on the previous patchset without any reason that gave
me the impression of being ignored. When I feel ignored, I go
somehwere else.
Besides, it would have taken less time to just apply the patch than
to have this discussion.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists