netdev - Re: [PATCH rfc] netfilter: two xtables matches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.01.1212052100190.30908@nerf07.vanv.qr>
Date:	Wed, 5 Dec 2012 21:00:36 +0100 (CET)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...i.de>
To:	Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
cc:	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, kaber@...sh.net,
	pablo@...filter.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH rfc] netfilter: two xtables matches

On Wednesday 2012-12-05 20:28, Willem de Bruijn wrote:

>Somehow, the first part of this email went missing. Not critical,
>but for completeness:
>
>These two patches each add an xtables match.
>
>The xt_priority match is a straighforward addition in the style of
>xt_mark, adding the option to filter on one more sk_buff field. I
>have an immediate application for this. The amount of code (in
>kernel + userspace) to add a single check proved quite large.

Hm so yeah, can't we just place this in xt_mark.c?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html