netdev - Re: [PATCH] tulip: Fix compiler warning when CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 06 Dec 2012 16:35:05 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	christoph.paasch@...ouvain.be
Cc:	grundler@...isc-linux.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tulip: Fix compiler warning when
 CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y

From: Christoph Paasch <christoph.paasch@...ouvain.be>
Date: Thu,  6 Dec 2012 14:04:27 +0100

> WARNING: drivers/net/ethernet/dec/tulip/tulip.o(.text+0x4057): Section
> mismatch in reference from the function tulip_init_one() to the variable
> .devinit.rodata:early_486_chipsets
> The function tulip_init_one() references
> the variable __devinitconst early_486_chipsets.
> This is often because tulip_init_one lacks a __devinitconst
> annotation or the annotation of early_486_chipsets is wrong.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Paasch <christoph.paasch@...ouvain.be>

Can you at least do the bare minimum amount of research when making
"fixes" like this?

These __devinit removals were done on purpose.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html