netdev - Re: [PATCH rfc] netfilter: two xtables matches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 6 Dec 2012 06:22:46 +0100
From:	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...i.de>
Cc:	Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, kaber@...sh.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH rfc] netfilter: two xtables matches

On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 09:00:36PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Wednesday 2012-12-05 20:28, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> 
> >Somehow, the first part of this email went missing. Not critical,
> >but for completeness:
> >
> >These two patches each add an xtables match.
> >
> >The xt_priority match is a straighforward addition in the style of
> >xt_mark, adding the option to filter on one more sk_buff field. I
> >have an immediate application for this. The amount of code (in
> >kernel + userspace) to add a single check proved quite large.
> 
> Hm so yeah, can't we just place this in xt_mark.c?

I don't feel this belongs to xt_mark at all.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html