[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1925714.MfFlfY86Ce@sifl>
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2012 10:46:42 -0500
From: Paul Moore <pmoore@...hat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
selinux@...ho.nsa.gov, mst@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] tun: correctly report an error in tun_flow_init()
On Thursday, December 06, 2012 06:31:29 PM Jason Wang wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 05, 2012 03:26:04 PM Paul Moore wrote:
> > On error, the error code from tun_flow_init() is lost inside
> > tun_set_iff(), this patch fixes this by assigning the tun_flow_init()
> > error code to the "err" variable which is returned by
> > the tun_flow_init() function on error.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <pmoore@...hat.com>
> > ---
> >
> > drivers/net/tun.c | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
> > index a1b2389..14a0454 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/tun.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
> > @@ -1591,7 +1591,8 @@ static int tun_set_iff(struct net *net, struct file
> > *file, struct ifreq *ifr)
> >
> > tun_net_init(dev);
> >
> > - if (tun_flow_init(tun))
> > + err = tun_flow_init(tun);
> > + if (err < 0)
> >
> > goto err_free_dev;
> >
> > dev->hw_features = NETIF_F_SG | NETIF_F_FRAGLIST |
> >
> > --
>
> Looks fine, we can separate this out of this series and replace the RFC with
> net-next to let David apply it soon.
Will do shortly.
--
paul moore
security and virtualization @ redhat
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists