[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50C0E300.3000703@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2012 13:25:04 -0500
From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>
To: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
CC: linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sctp: proc: protect bind_addr->address_list accesses
with rcu_read_lock()
On 12/06/2012 12:34 PM, Thomas Graf wrote:
> address_list is protected via the socket lock or RCU. Since we don't want
> to take the socket lock for each assoc we dump in procfs a RCU read-side
> critical section must be entered.
>
> Cc: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>
> Cc: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
> ---
> net/sctp/proc.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sctp/proc.c b/net/sctp/proc.c
> index 9966e7b..ec9b0c8 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/proc.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/proc.c
> @@ -139,7 +139,8 @@ static void sctp_seq_dump_local_addrs(struct seq_file *seq, struct sctp_ep_commo
> primary = &peer->saddr;
> }
>
> - list_for_each_entry(laddr, &epb->bind_addr.address_list, list) {
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + list_for_each_entry_rcu(laddr, &epb->bind_addr.address_list, list) {
> addr = &laddr->a;
> af = sctp_get_af_specific(addr->sa.sa_family);
> if (primary && af->cmp_addr(addr, primary)) {
> @@ -147,6 +148,7 @@ static void sctp_seq_dump_local_addrs(struct seq_file *seq, struct sctp_ep_commo
> }
> af->seq_dump_addr(seq, addr);
> }
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> }
>
> /* Dump remote addresses of an association. */
>
May want to avoid printing addresses that are !addr->valid.
Otherwise looks good.
-vlad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists