[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20121207.142845.1145515122357569641.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 14:28:45 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: joseph.gasparakis@...el.com
Cc: bhutchings@...arflare.com, alexander.h.duyck@...el.com,
shemminger@...tta.com, chrisw@...s-sol.org, gospo@...hat.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dmitry@...adcom.com, saeed.bishara@...il.com,
peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] net: Add support for hardware-offloaded
encapsulation
From: Joseph Gasparakis <joseph.gasparakis@...el.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 10:24:17 -0800 (PST)
> So the idea here is that the driver will use the headers for checksumming
> if the skb->encapsulation bit is on. The bit should be set in the protocol
> driver.
>
> To answer the second comment, the flags that we use in this series of
> patches is NETIF_F_IP_CSUM, NETIF_F_IPV6_CSUM and NETIF_F_SG. These are
> the bits that we propose will be used for checksumming of encapsulation.
> As per a previous comment in v2, the hw_enc_features field should be used
> also in the future when NICs have more encap offloads, so one could
> indicate these features there from the driver.
>
> Furthermore, I submitted a patch for Rx checksumming, where NETIF_F_RXCSUM
> is used, again in conjunction with skb->encapsulation flag. As I mention
> in my logs, the driver is expected to set the ip_summed to UNNECESSARY and
> turn the skb->encapsulation on, to indicate that the inner headers are
> already HW checksummed.
>
This is the kind of language that belongs in the commit message and
code comments.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists