lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1354912923.9124.1.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 21:42:03 +0100 From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> Cc: eric@...it.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linville@...driver.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] af_packet: don't to defrag shared skb On Fri, 2012-12-07 at 15:31 -0500, David Miller wrote: > From: Eric Leblond <eric@...it.org> > Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 19:56:01 +0100 > > Wireless folks, please take a look. The issue is that, > under the circumstances listed below, we get SKBs in > the AF_PACKET input path that are shared. > > Given the logic present in ieee80211_deliver_skb() I think > the mac80211 code doesn't expect this either. Indeed, it would certainly not like this, I'll take a look. Eric, what's the driver you're using? I'm wondering whether paged skbs vs. all data in the header would make a difference, hence the question. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists