lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:16:23 +0530
From:	Vipul Pandya <vipul@...lsio.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"roland@...estorage.com" <roland@...estorage.com>,
	Divy Le Ray <divy@...lsio.com>,
	Dimitrios Michailidis <dm@...lsio.com>,
	Kumar A S <kumaras@...lsio.com>,
	Steve Wise <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>,
	Abhishek Agrawal <abhishek@...lsio.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/5] cxgb4: Add T4 filter support



On 04-12-2012 00:32, David Miller wrote:
> From: Vipul Pandya <vipul@...lsio.com>
> Date: Mon,  3 Dec 2012 16:52:57 +0530
> 
>> +	/*
>> +	 * If the new or old filter have loopback rewriteing rules then we'll
>> +	 * need to free any existing Layer Two Table (L2T) entries of the old
>> +	 * filter rule.  The firmware will handle freeing up any Source MAC
>> +	 * Table (SMT) entries used for rewriting Source MAC Addresses in
>> +	 * loopback rules.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (f->l2t)
>> +		cxgb4_l2t_release(f->l2t);
>> +
>> +	/* The zeroing of the filter rule below clears the filter valid,
>> +	 * pending, locked flags, l2t pointer, etc. so it's all we need for
>> +	 * this operation.
>> +	 */
> 
> My greatest amusement is achieved when someone gets a code formatting
> rule both correct and wrong in the same patch, as you have done here.
> 
> Format comments in the networking:
> 
> 	/* Like
> 	 * this.
> 	 */
> 
> 	 /*
> 	  * Never,
> 	  * like this.
> 	  */
> 
> Thanks.
> 

I have submitted the series again making above changes. Thanks for
pointing out the same. I wonder how checkpatch.pl did not complain or
gave a warning for the incorrect commenting style. I corrected only
those comments for which checkpatch.pl gave me a warning. So, I think
there are some checks missing in checkpatch.pl script.

Thanks,
Vipul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists