[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKh2mn5LgZBJDJWNzN8A3NK72Vk_fiUjJfmdn5njSrm400q36w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:18:21 +0000
From: Steve Glendinning <steve@...well.net>
To: Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
Cc: Steve Glendinning <steve.glendinning@...well.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] smsc95xx: enable dynamic autosuspend (RFC)
On 10 December 2012 12:09, Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org> wrote:
> So this is a problem with remote wakeup on older hardware?
Exactly, the older hardware revisions can't reliably do it.
>> Unfortunately we don't know if the connected device supports
>> this feature until we query its ID register at runtime.
>>
>> Suggestions on how best to indicate this capability at runtime
>> instead of compile-time would be appreciated, so we don't have
>> to repeatedly fail if accidentally enabled. Or maybe this is
>> actually the best way?
>
> If this is a problem with remote wakeup, you should up the
> pm counter (usb_autopm_get_noresume()) in .manage_power
> That was the reason I implemented this is a callback and not as
> a helper in usbnet.
Thanks, so something like this should do the job?
static int smsc95xx_manage_power(struct usbnet *dev, int on)
{
struct smsc95xx_priv *pdata = (struct smsc95xx_priv *)(dev->data[0]);
dev->intf->needs_remote_wakeup = on;
if (pdata->features & FEATURE_AUTOSUSPEND)
return 0;
/* this chip revision doesn't support autosuspend */
netdev_info(dev->net, "hardware doesn't support USB autosuspend\n");
if (on)
usb_autopm_get_interface_no_resume(dev->intf);
else
usb_autopm_put_interface_no_suspend(dev->intf);
return 0;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists