[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.00.1212111432430.78903@animac.local>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 14:36:33 -0800 (PST)
From: Ani Sinha <ani@...stanetworks.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
cc: Michael Richardson <mcr@...delman.ca>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
tcpdump-workers@...ts.tcpdump.org,
Francesco Ruggeri <fruggeri@...stanetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [tcpdump-workers] vlan tagged packets and libpcap breakage
>
> It is possible to test for the presence of support of the new vlan bpf
> extensions by attempting to load a filter that uses them. As only valid
> filters can be loaded, old kernels that do not support filtering of vlan
> tags will fail to load the a test filter with uses them.
Unfortunately I do not see this. The sk_chk_filter() does not have a
default in the case statement and the check will not detect an unknown
instruction. It will fail when the filter is run and as far as I can see,
the packet will be dropped. Something like this might help?
diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
index c23543c..96338aa 100644
--- a/net/core/filter.c
+++ b/net/core/filter.c
@@ -548,6 +548,8 @@ int sk_chk_filter(struct sock_filter *filter, unsigned int flen)
return -EINVAL;
/* Some instructions need special checks */
switch (code) {
+ /* for unknown instruction, return EINVAL */
+ default : return -EINVAL;
case BPF_S_ALU_DIV_K:
/* check for division by zero */
if (ftest->k == 0)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists