netdev - Re: [tcpdump-workers] vlan tagged packets and libpcap breakage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:50:27 -0800
From:	Ani Sinha <ani@...stanetworks.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Michael Richardson <mcr@...delman.ca>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	tcpdump-workers@...ts.tcpdump.org,
	Francesco Ruggeri <fruggeri@...stanetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [tcpdump-workers] vlan tagged packets and libpcap breakage

On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-12-11 at 14:36 -0800, Ani Sinha wrote:
>> >
>> > It is possible to test for the presence of support of the new vlan bpf

> If you want to test ANCILLARY possible values, its already too late, as
> old kernels wont use any patch anyway.
>

So basically this means that if we generate a filter with these
special negative offset values and expect that the kernel will
complain if it does not recognize the newer values then we would be
wrong. And you are right. Old kernels never knew about them and the
code wasn't written in a way to return EINVAL if it didn't recognize a
special negative anciliary offset value.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html