netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 0/5] Ease netns management for userland

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 13 Dec 2012 18:41:46 +0100
From:	Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
To:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, aatteka@...ira.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 0/5] Ease netns management for userland

Le 12/12/2012 22:48, Eric W. Biederman a écrit :
> ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman) writes:
>
>> It is very wrong to presume that without context you know the reason for
>> the exsitence of any network namespace and that you should or even that
>> you can manage it.  Think of running your multi-network namespace
>> managing application in a container.
>
> A good example of a network namespace you don't want to mess with are
> the network namespaces created by vsftp and chrome for security purposes
> to remove any possibility of creating new connections to the network.
>
Ok, I get the point.

A last question: from an administration point of view, is it intended to
not be able to monitor which netns are currently used? Like it can be done
for sockets, files, ...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html