[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4228102.c0z2lbILKD@linux-lqwf.site>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 15:22:31 +0100
From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de>
To: Steve Glendinning <steve@...well.net>
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>,
Steve Glendinning <steve.glendinning@...well.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2][RFC] smsc95xx: enable dynamic autosuspend
On Friday 14 December 2012 13:35:04 Steve Glendinning wrote:
> Thanks Ming, I've updated this.
Very good. Good catch Ming.
> > IMO, it is better to keep smsc95xx_info.manage_power as NULL
> > for devices without FEATURE_AUTOSUSPEND, so that fewer code
> > and follow the current .mange_power usage(see its comment).
> >
> > Currently, if the function pointer of manage_power is set, it means that
> > the device supports USB autosuspend, but your trick will make the
manage_power() can return errors. So the assumption was always
strictly speaking invalid.
> > assumption not true for some smsc devices.
>
> Oliver?
On second thought, I think that if a driver can do manage_power(), even
only for a subset of devices, it should implement it. Doctoring the table of methods
is very, very ugly, especially as this not protected by a lock.
But this is not nice. We need a better way.
Regards
Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists