netdev - Re: [Netperf PATCH] output remote_send_size in TCP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <50CB99DC.8030304@hp.com>
Date:	Fri, 14 Dec 2012 13:27:56 -0800
From:	Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
To:	Amos Kong <akong@...hat.com>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Netperf PATCH] output remote_send_size in TCP_MAERTS result

On 12/14/2012 02:49 AM, Amos Kong wrote:
> When I executed TCP_MAERTS by following command line:
>    netperf-2.6.0 -H 192.168.58.23 -l 10 -C -t TCP_MAERTS -- -m 512,1024
> The outputed send size is '512'.
>
> When I executed TCP_MAERTS by following command line:
>    netperf-2.6.0 -H 192.168.58.23 -l 10 -t TCP_MAERTS -- -m 512,1024
> The outputed send size is '1024'.
>
> In TCP_MAERTS test, we should output the remote send size '1024',
> this patch fixed this issue.

Hi Amos -

While I suspect at least a few folks on the netdev list are interested 
in "things netperf," netperf is not maintained via the netdev list. 
There are two lists hosted on netperf.org which pertain to "things 
netperf."  The first is netperf-talk which is geared towards users.  The 
second netperf-dev which is geared towards those developing netperf.

No need to re-post there this time (though feel free to for the 
archives), I've gone ahead and applied the fix to the netperf top-of-trunk.

happy benchmarking,

rick jones
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html