[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50CBA55F.6030300@pengutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 23:17:03 +0100
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
sfr@...b.auug.org.au, andreas@...sler.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] can: sja1000: fix compilation on x86
On 12/14/2012 10:37 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 22:33:44 +0100
>
>> @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ static int sja1000_ofp_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev)
>> }
>>
>> irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, 0);
>> - if (irq == NO_IRQ) {
>> + if (irq <= 0) {
>> dev_err(&ofdev->dev, "no irq found\n");
>> err = -ENODEV;
>> goto exit_unmap_mem;
>
> I don't see anything existing which says this is the proper
> transformation.
>
> There is no consistency at all for the tests of the return
> value of irq_of_parse_and_map().
Right. And the current status of NO_IRQ doesn't help much.
> And if anything testing against zero is the correct thing to
> do, universally.
I've looked at the implementation of irq_of_parse_and_map() (both the
generic and sparc one), they both return 0 on failure. Because there are
some arch that define NO_IRQ being not 0, sparc (0xffffffff) and arm
(-1), I though testing against <= 0 would be a good idea.
> I'm not applying this or pulling from your tree, sorry.
Marc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (262 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists