netdev - [PATCH 08/15] SUNRPC/cache: use new hashtable implementation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1355756497-15834-8-git-send-email-sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Date:	Mon, 17 Dec 2012 10:01:28 -0500
From:	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
To:	Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>,
	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 08/15] SUNRPC/cache: use new hashtable implementation

Switch cache to use the new hashtable implementation. This reduces the amount
of generic unrelated code in the cache implementation.

This patch depends on d9b482c ("hashtable: introduce a small and naive
hashtable") which was merged in v3.6.

Tested-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@...ldses.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
---
 net/sunrpc/cache.c | 18 +++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/sunrpc/cache.c b/net/sunrpc/cache.c
index 9afa439..d4539b6 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/cache.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/cache.c
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
 #include <linux/workqueue.h>
 #include <linux/mutex.h>
 #include <linux/pagemap.h>
+#include <linux/hashtable.h>
 #include <asm/ioctls.h>
 #include <linux/sunrpc/types.h>
 #include <linux/sunrpc/cache.h>
@@ -524,19 +525,18 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cache_purge);
  * it to be revisited when cache info is available
  */
 
-#define	DFR_HASHSIZE	(PAGE_SIZE/sizeof(struct list_head))
-#define	DFR_HASH(item)	((((long)item)>>4 ^ (((long)item)>>13)) % DFR_HASHSIZE)
+#define	DFR_HASH_BITS	9
 
 #define	DFR_MAX	300	/* ??? */
 
 static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(cache_defer_lock);
 static LIST_HEAD(cache_defer_list);
-static struct hlist_head cache_defer_hash[DFR_HASHSIZE];
+static DEFINE_HASHTABLE(cache_defer_hash, DFR_HASH_BITS);
 static int cache_defer_cnt;
 
 static void __unhash_deferred_req(struct cache_deferred_req *dreq)
 {
-	hlist_del_init(&dreq->hash);
+	hash_del(&dreq->hash);
 	if (!list_empty(&dreq->recent)) {
 		list_del_init(&dreq->recent);
 		cache_defer_cnt--;
@@ -545,10 +545,7 @@ static void __unhash_deferred_req(struct cache_deferred_req *dreq)
 
 static void __hash_deferred_req(struct cache_deferred_req *dreq, struct cache_head *item)
 {
-	int hash = DFR_HASH(item);
-
-	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dreq->recent);
-	hlist_add_head(&dreq->hash, &cache_defer_hash[hash]);
+	hash_add(cache_defer_hash, &dreq->hash, (unsigned long)item);
 }
 
 static void setup_deferral(struct cache_deferred_req *dreq,
@@ -600,7 +597,7 @@ static void cache_wait_req(struct cache_req *req, struct cache_head *item)
 		 * to clean up
 		 */
 		spin_lock(&cache_defer_lock);
-		if (!hlist_unhashed(&sleeper.handle.hash)) {
+		if (hash_hashed(&sleeper.handle.hash)) {
 			__unhash_deferred_req(&sleeper.handle);
 			spin_unlock(&cache_defer_lock);
 		} else {
@@ -671,12 +668,11 @@ static void cache_revisit_request(struct cache_head *item)
 	struct cache_deferred_req *dreq;
 	struct list_head pending;
 	struct hlist_node *lp, *tmp;
-	int hash = DFR_HASH(item);
 
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pending);
 	spin_lock(&cache_defer_lock);
 
-	hlist_for_each_entry_safe(dreq, lp, tmp, &cache_defer_hash[hash], hash)
+	hash_for_each_possible_safe(cache_defer_hash, dreq, lp, tmp, hash, (unsigned long)item)
 		if (dreq->item == item) {
 			__unhash_deferred_req(dreq);
 			list_add(&dreq->recent, &pending);
-- 
1.8.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html