lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121218171103.GI27746@casper.infradead.org>
Date:	Tue, 18 Dec 2012 17:11:03 +0000
From:	Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
To:	David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
Cc:	nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com, bhutchings@...arflare.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] netlink: align attributes on 64-bits

On 12/18/12 at 04:50pm, David Laight wrote:
> > 2/ Suppose that the attribute is:
> > 
> >    struct foo {
> >    	__u64 bar1;
> >    	__u32 bar2;
> >    }
> >    => sizeof(struct foo) = 12 (= payload)
> 
> That is only true if the host architecture aligns 64bit items
> on 32 it boundaries (as i386 does).
> Otherwise there are 4 bytes of padding at the end and the
> size is 16.
> 
> Actually it is worse than that.
> Consider the structure:
> 	struct bar {
> 		__u32 foo1;
> 		__u64 foo2;
> 	}
> On i386 it will have size 12 and foo2 will be at offset 4.
> On sparc32 (and most 64bit) it will have size 16 with foo2
> at offset 8 (and 4 bytes of pad after foo1).

This is a known problem and I can't think of anything
that can be done about it except for memcpy()ing the
data before accessing it.

If you have ideas, I'm more that willing to listen :)

> Do these messages move between systems?
> If they do then any 64bit items need an explicit alignment
> eg tag with __attribute__((aligned(8))) (or aligned(4)).

They don't. Netlink has and will be host bound. It also
uses host byte order for that reason.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ