[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121218171103.GI27746@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 17:11:03 +0000
From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
Cc: nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com, bhutchings@...arflare.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] netlink: align attributes on 64-bits
On 12/18/12 at 04:50pm, David Laight wrote:
> > 2/ Suppose that the attribute is:
> >
> > struct foo {
> > __u64 bar1;
> > __u32 bar2;
> > }
> > => sizeof(struct foo) = 12 (= payload)
>
> That is only true if the host architecture aligns 64bit items
> on 32 it boundaries (as i386 does).
> Otherwise there are 4 bytes of padding at the end and the
> size is 16.
>
> Actually it is worse than that.
> Consider the structure:
> struct bar {
> __u32 foo1;
> __u64 foo2;
> }
> On i386 it will have size 12 and foo2 will be at offset 4.
> On sparc32 (and most 64bit) it will have size 16 with foo2
> at offset 8 (and 4 bytes of pad after foo1).
This is a known problem and I can't think of anything
that can be done about it except for memcpy()ing the
data before accessing it.
If you have ideas, I'm more that willing to listen :)
> Do these messages move between systems?
> If they do then any 64bit items need an explicit alignment
> eg tag with __attribute__((aligned(8))) (or aligned(4)).
They don't. Netlink has and will be host bound. It also
uses host byte order for that reason.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists