[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1355933869.21834.13.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 08:17:49 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <erdnetdev@...il.com>
To: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@...elenboom.it>
Cc: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
annie li <annie.li@...cle.com>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen/netfront: improve truesize tracking
On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 12:34 +0100, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> Hi Ian,
>
> It ran overnight and i haven't seen the warn_once trigger.
> (but i also didn't with the previous patch)
>
As I said, the miminum value to not trigger the warning was what Ian
patch was doing, but it was still a not accurate estimation.
Doing the real accounting might trigger slow transferts, or dropped
packets because of socket limits (SNDBUF / RCVBUF) being hit sooner.
So the real question was : If accounting for full pages, is your
applications run as smooth as before, with no huge performance
regression ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists