[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50D1EA8F.7070504@linux-ipv6.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 01:25:51 +0900
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
To: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>
CC: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL net-next 04/17] ndisc: Introduce ndisc_fill_redirect_hdr_option().
Bjørn Mork wrote:
> YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org> writes:
>
>> Signed-off-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
>> ---
>> net/ipv6/ndisc.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------
>> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/ipv6/ndisc.c b/net/ipv6/ndisc.c
>> index a181113..0a4f3a9 100644
>> --- a/net/ipv6/ndisc.c
>> +++ b/net/ipv6/ndisc.c
>> @@ -1332,6 +1332,19 @@ static void ndisc_redirect_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb)
>> icmpv6_notify(skb, NDISC_REDIRECT, 0, 0);
>> }
>>
>> +static u8 *ndisc_fill_redirect_hdr_option(u8 *opt, struct sk_buff *orig_skb,
>> + int rd_len)
>> +{
>> + memset(opt, 0, 8);
>> + *(opt++) = ND_OPT_REDIRECT_HDR;
>> + *(opt++) = (rd_len >> 3);
>> + opt += 6;
>> +
>> + memcpy(opt, ipv6_hdr(orig_skb), rd_len - 8);
>> +
>> + return opt;
>> +}
>> +
>
> I realize that it doesn't currently matter, but the above modification
> of "opt" looks like a bug-waiting-to-happen to me.
>
>> void ndisc_send_redirect(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct in6_addr *target)
>> {
>> struct net_device *dev = skb->dev;
>> @@ -1461,12 +1474,8 @@ void ndisc_send_redirect(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct in6_addr *target)
>> * build redirect option and copy skb over to the new packet.
>> */
>>
>> - memset(opt, 0, 8);
>> - *(opt++) = ND_OPT_REDIRECT_HDR;
>> - *(opt++) = (rd_len >> 3);
>> - opt += 6;
>> -
>> - memcpy(opt, ipv6_hdr(skb), rd_len - 8);
>> + if (rd_len)
>> + opt = ndisc_fill_redirect_hdr_option(opt, skb, rd_len);
>
>
> I understand that opt isn't currently used after this, but if it ever is
> then it is going to come as big a surprise that this implies opt += 8;
>
> This was previously quite clear when the code was inline, but it becomes
> problematic when it is factored out.
I understand your concern. opt will be disappeared by following
changeset (12 of 17).
--yoshfuji
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists