netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/2] Fix some multiqueue TUN problems

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2198139.EQv1ADVakk@sifl>
Date:	Wed, 19 Dec 2012 11:59:49 -0500
From:	Paul Moore <pmoore@...hat.com>
To:	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, selinux@...ho.nsa.gov,
	eparis@...hat.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, jasowang@...hat.com, mst@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/2] Fix some multiqueue TUN problems

On Tuesday, December 18, 2012 05:53:37 PM Paul Moore wrote:
> A refresh/respin of the LSM/SELinux fixes to work on top of Jason's
> latest API tweak (now living in DaveM's net tree).  In general, I
> believe the hooks and thinking behind the v2 patchset still make sense
> so no changes there, although I did change the SELinux permission from
> "create_queue" to "attach_queue" to match the API changes.
> 
> Comments are welcome and encouraged; we need to get this fixed before
> 3.8 is released.

SELinux (I'm looking at you Eric) and LSM folks - any comments/objections to 
these changes?

> ---
> 
> Paul Moore (2):
>       selinux: add the "attach_queue" permission to the "tun_socket" class
>       tun: fix LSM/SELinux labeling of tun/tap devices

-- 
paul moore
security and virtualization @ redhat

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html