netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next V4 02/13] bridge: Add vlan filtering infrastructure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 20 Dec 2012 15:39:13 +0200
From:	Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@...il.com>
To:	Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, shemminger@...tta.com, davem@...emloft.net,
	or.gerlitz@...il.com, jhs@...atatu.com, mst@...hat.com,
	erdnetdev@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V4 02/13] bridge: Add vlan filtering
 infrastructure

Hi Vlad,

On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 12:48:13 -0500 Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com> wrote:
> +static void nbp_vlan_flush(struct net_bridge_port *p)
> +{
> +	struct net_port_vlan *pve;
> +	struct net_port_vlan *tmp;
> +
> +	ASSERT_RTNL();
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(pve, tmp, &p->vlan_list, list)
> +		nbp_vlan_delete(p, pve->vid, BRIDGE_FLAGS_SELF);

Why would you want to clear "bridge master port" association from this
vlan, in the event of NBP destruction?
The "bridge port" may still be a member of this vlan, doesn't it?
Seems flags argument should be 0.

> +#define BR_VID_HASH_SIZE (1<<6)
> +#define br_vlan_hash(vid) ((vid) % (BR_VID_HASH_SIZE - 1))

Did you mean:                       & (BR_VID_HASH_SIZE - 1)

Regards,
Shmulik
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html