[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50D32F42.2070904@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 10:31:14 -0500
From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com>
To: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@...il.com>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, shemminger@...tta.com, davem@...emloft.net,
or.gerlitz@...il.com, jhs@...atatu.com, mst@...hat.com,
erdnetdev@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V4 02/13] bridge: Add vlan filtering infrastructure
On 12/20/2012 08:39 AM, Shmulik Ladkani wrote:
> Hi Vlad,
>
> On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 12:48:13 -0500 Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com> wrote:
>> +static void nbp_vlan_flush(struct net_bridge_port *p)
>> +{
>> + struct net_port_vlan *pve;
>> + struct net_port_vlan *tmp;
>> +
>> + ASSERT_RTNL();
>> +
>> + list_for_each_entry_safe(pve, tmp, &p->vlan_list, list)
>> + nbp_vlan_delete(p, pve->vid, BRIDGE_FLAGS_SELF);
>
> Why would you want to clear "bridge master port" association from this
> vlan, in the event of NBP destruction?
> The "bridge port" may still be a member of this vlan, doesn't it?
> Seems flags argument should be 0.
This ends up getting fixed later, but you are right. This should be 0.
>
>> +#define BR_VID_HASH_SIZE (1<<6)
>> +#define br_vlan_hash(vid) ((vid) % (BR_VID_HASH_SIZE - 1))
>
> Did you mean: & (BR_VID_HASH_SIZE - 1)
yes.
thanks
-vlad
>
> Regards,
> Shmulik
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists