netdev - Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: act_xt support new Xtables interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 21 Dec 2012 15:35:22 +0100 (CET)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...i.de>
To:	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
cc:	Yury Stankevich <urykhy@...il.com>,
	Hasan Chowdhury <shemonc@...il.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	pablo@...filter.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: act_xt support new Xtables interface


On Friday 2012-12-21 14:50, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> On 12-12-21 08:13 AM, Yury Stankevich wrote:

>> i use it ingress,
>> so, i need to use tc xt action
>> to get mark on the packet, before filter on ifb will run.
>> prerouting rule, in turn, used to test if mark was actually restored.
>
> No experience with connmark, but - in order to restore something has
> to store it, correct?

The bigger problem here, if I see __netif_receive_skb right, is that
when ingress rules run, skb->nfct is still unset, thereby the
CONNMARK action is a no-op.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html