[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1356134481.21834.8090.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 16:01:21 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <erdnetdev@...il.com>
To: Zhiyun Qian <zhiyunq@...ch.edu>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: TCP sequence number inference attack on Linux
On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 18:52 -0500, Zhiyun Qian wrote:
> It seems that it is not straightforward to simply move tcp_ack()
> before tcp_validate_incoming() as tcp_ack() currently assumes the tcp
> sequence number is already validated and it may adjust certain states
> purely depending on the ACK number. I guess the solution is to extract
> all safety checks out and put at the very beginning. The rest of the
> code in tcp_validate_incoming() and tcp_ack() may still need to
> perform the redundant checks since if some state changes are dependent
> on the sequence number or ACK number (e.g., window update).
>
> I'm willing to help on this. Perhaps I can draft an initial patch and
> you can help take a look before I submit it?
I began coding a serie of patches.
Part of the problem comes from a 'fast path' idea that was nice 20 years
ago but no longer a real killer these days.
So some tests are duplicated, others are not correctly done.
For example, the fast path misses the more complete tests done in
tcp_ack()
Its a big mess.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists