[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50D5FCEA.9060406@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 19:33:14 +0100
From: Stephan Gatzka <stephan.gatzka@...il.com>
To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
CC: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: IPv6 over Firewire
>
> You could add another case to include/net/ndisc.h::ndisc_addr_option_pad()
> with a hardcoded size, couldn't you?
>
No, I think that is almost certainly not a good idea. The address space
option is handed over to the firewire_net driver like this:
type, length, soure/target link address (GUID)
If I add another case in ndisc_addr_option_pad() I think the option will
look like this:
pad, type, length, soure/target link address (GUID)
Because pad, type and GUID are already at the correct position for the
3146 link layer option. So with padding I have to copy them to the
correct position.
All I need is some (8 bytes) of additional tail room in the ndisc skb.
This could be achieved either by specifying needed_tailroom in the
firewire netdevice struct at the expense that now every skb allocated
might get 8 bytes more allocated.
The second option is yoshfuji suggestion to pimp ndisc_opt_addr_space a
bit. His solution only allocates additional memory for ndisc packets at
the expense to introduce a dependency to the struct
ndisc_opt_ieee1394_llinfo.
These are the two option we can go for. Personally I think reserving a
bit more tail room looks cleaner if nobody votes against it...
Regards,
Stephan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists