netdev - Re: [Patch] arp: fix a regression in arp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 23 Dec 2012 15:49:58 +0100
From:	Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
To:	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
Subject: Re: [Patch] arp: fix a regression in arp_solicit()

On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> wrote:
> From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
>
> Sedat reported the following commit caused a regression:
>
> commit 9650388b5c56578fdccc79c57a8c82fb92b8e7f1
> Author: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> Date:   Fri Dec 21 07:32:10 2012 +0000
>
>     ipv4: arp: fix a lockdep splat in arp_solicit
>
> This is due to the 6th parameter of arp_send() needs to be NULL
> for broatcase case, the above commit changed it to all-zero non-NULL
> hw addr.
>

s/broatcase/broadcast ?

- Sedat -

> Reported-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
> Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
> Cc: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> Cc: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
>
> ---
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/arp.c b/net/ipv4/arp.c
> index 1169ed4..9547a273 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/arp.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/arp.c
> @@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ static void arp_error_report(struct neighbour *neigh, struct sk_buff *skb)
>  static void arp_solicit(struct neighbour *neigh, struct sk_buff *skb)
>  {
>         __be32 saddr = 0;
> -       u8 dst_ha[MAX_ADDR_LEN];
> +       u8 dst_ha[MAX_ADDR_LEN], *dst_hw = NULL;
>         struct net_device *dev = neigh->dev;
>         __be32 target = *(__be32 *)neigh->primary_key;
>         int probes = atomic_read(&neigh->probes);
> @@ -364,8 +364,8 @@ static void arp_solicit(struct neighbour *neigh, struct sk_buff *skb)
>                 if (!(neigh->nud_state & NUD_VALID))
>                         pr_debug("trying to ucast probe in NUD_INVALID\n");
>                 neigh_ha_snapshot(dst_ha, neigh, dev);
> +               dst_hw = dst_ha;
>         } else {
> -               memset(dst_ha, 0, dev->addr_len);
>                 probes -= neigh->parms->app_probes;
>                 if (probes < 0) {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_ARPD
> @@ -376,7 +376,7 @@ static void arp_solicit(struct neighbour *neigh, struct sk_buff *skb)
>         }
>
>         arp_send(ARPOP_REQUEST, ETH_P_ARP, target, dev, saddr,
> -                dst_ha, dev->dev_addr, NULL);
> +                dst_hw, dev->dev_addr, NULL);
>  }
>
>  static int arp_ignore(struct in_device *in_dev, __be32 sip, __be32 tip)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html