[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50D74C81.1000400@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 19:25:05 +0100
From: Stephan Gatzka <stephan.gatzka@...il.com>
To: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de
Subject: Re: IPv6 over Firewire
> Please, please do not alter bits in your driver, to maintain
> extensibility of protocols.
>
> I am definitely okay to have firewire supporting stuff in
> net/ipv6/ndisc.c. Since we already have notification
> mechanism, I don't think it will be large.
>
O.k., let's try it your way.
I believe the the changes in the transmit portions for ndisc are rather
simple. All firewire specific information is stored in the private data
of struct net_device. For the receive section I think I have to change
something in ndisc_recv_ns(), I'll figure that out. Maybe I need some
(small) support from you, but I think we can do that off list.
I'll try it out but after Christmas. :)
But I have to emphasize that I really need (read) access to the firewire
specific portions of the link layer option in the firewire net driver.
That _is_ necessary to build the relation between the firewire hardware
address (GUID) and the corresponding firewire node.
Because you mentioned IPSEC: Are the ndisc packets also encrypted? If
so, I just can't imagine how I can do the mapping of firewire hardware
addresses and firewire nodes.
@Stefan: Are you o.k. if I go that way?
Regards,
Stephan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists