[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50D86136.6070006@mojatatu.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 09:05:42 -0500
From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
CC: Felix Fietkau <nbd@...nwrt.org>,
Yury Stankevich <urykhy@...il.com>,
Hasan Chowdhury <shemonc@...il.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...i.de>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: act_xt support new Xtables interface
Hi Pablo,
On 12-12-24 08:12 AM, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
>
> conntrack needs to see defragmented packets, you have to call
> nf_defrag_ipv4 / _ipv6 respectively before that.
>
This should not be too hard to do - although my thinking says this
should be a separate action.
> This also changes the semantics of the raw table in iptables since it
> will now see packet with conntrack already attached. So this would
> also break -j CT --notrack.
>
Is there a flag we can check which says a flow is not to be tracked?
Doesnt nf_conntrack_in() fail if --no track is set?
> This needs more thinking. I can appreciate the value of calling
> conntrack from different points of the packet traversal, but there are
> a couple of thing we have to resolve before allowing that.
There is user need for this Pablo - as you can see from what Felix
deployed it seems to be used a lot more wider audience dependency.
What do we need to do to get this to work properly?
cheers,
jamal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists