lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20121228214052.GD3062@mtj.dyndns.org> Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 16:40:52 -0500 From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, wg@...ndegger.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/25] sja1000: don't use [delayed_]work_pending() On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 12:01:11AM -0800, David Miller wrote: > From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> > Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 17:56:53 -0800 > > > There's no need to test whether a (delayed) work item in pending > > before queueing, flushing or cancelling it. Most uses are unnecessary > > and quite a few of them are buggy. > > > > Remove unnecessary pending tests from sja1000. Only compile tested. > > > > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> > > Cc: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com> > > Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net> > > Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org > > --- > > Please let me know how this patch should be routed. I can take it > > through the workqueue tree if necessary. > > I would suggest just taking it via the workqueue tree, thanks Tejun. Applied to wq/for-3.9-cleanups w/ your Acked-by added. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists