netdev - Re: [patch net-next 01/15] net: introduce upper device lists

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20121230095338.GC1575@minipsycho.orion>
Date:	Sun, 30 Dec 2012 10:53:38 +0100
From:	Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
	bhutchings@...arflare.com, faisal.latif@...el.com,
	shemminger@...tta.com, fbl@...hat.com, roland@...nel.org,
	sean.hefty@...el.com, hal.rosenstock@...il.com, fubar@...ibm.com,
	andy@...yhouse.net, divy@...lsio.com, jitendra.kalsaria@...gic.com,
	sony.chacko@...gic.com, linux-driver@...gic.com, kaber@...sh.net,
	ursula.braun@...ibm.com, blaschka@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	schwidefsky@...ibm.com, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com,
	ebiederm@...ssion.com, joe@...ches.com, amwang@...hat.com,
	nhorman@...driver.com, john.r.fastabend@...el.com,
	pablo@...filter.org
Subject: Re: [patch net-next 01/15] net: introduce upper device lists

Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 12:31:01AM CET, davem@...emloft.net wrote:
>From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
>Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 11:38:28 +0100
>
>> +	/*
>> +	 * To prevent loops, check if dev is not upper device to upper_dev.
>> +	 */
>
>Please use:
>
>	/* To prevent loops, check if dev is not upper device to upper_dev.  */

fixed

>
>> +/**
>> + * netdev_upper_free_rcu - Frees a upper device list item via the RCU pointer
>> + * @entry: the entry's RCU field
>> + *
>> + * This function is designed to be used as a callback to the call_rcu()
>> + * function so that the memory allocated to the netdev upper device list item
>> + * can be released safely.
>> + */
>> +static void netdev_upper_free_rcu(struct rcu_head *entry)
>> +{
>> +	struct netdev_upper *upper;
>> +
>> +	upper = container_of(entry, struct netdev_upper, rcu);
>> +	kfree(upper);
>> +}
>
>Please use kfree_rcu().

fixed

>
>Also, since __netdev_has_upper_dev() modifies &search_list inside
>of the list traversal loop, I think you really need to use
>list_for_each_entry_safe() even though you always append to the
>tail of &search_list.

Hmm, I do not believe that list_for_each_entry_safe() would work correctly
here. In case that the current iterator is at the very end of
the list and now other items are added, list_for_each_entry_safe() would
remember that next is head and the newly added items would not be
processed. list_for_each_entry() works just fine in any case I can
imagine. Note that no items are removed during the iteration.
Am I missing something?

Thanks!

Jiri

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html