[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121230014403.GA2077@obelix.rh>
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 23:44:03 -0200
From: Flavio Leitner <fbl@...hat.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] team: add ethtool support
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 05:29:45PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Dec 2012 23:19:26 -0200
> Flavio Leitner <fbl@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > This patch adds few ethtool operations to team driver.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Flavio Leitner <fbl@...hat.com>
>
> What is the motivation for this? Is there an application that depends
> on ethtool (versus netlink, or /proc)?
Speaking as a support engineer, it's a lot easier to grab ethtool -S and
see everything than grab two or more outputs.
> Sorry, I see no point in providing ethtool statistics for generic data that is already
> reported by existing netlink and other infrastructure. The purpose of ethtool
> statistics is to report device specific that is not available through the normal
> generic statistics.
Right, but those statistics can be device specific as well. The tg3 and bnx2, for
instance, do the same reporting [rx|tx]_bytes|octets.
I see no harm, and it is helpful.
--
fbl
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists