[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121231112212.03319226@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 11:22:12 -0800
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
bhutchings@...arflare.com, faisal.latif@...el.com, fbl@...hat.com,
roland@...nel.org, sean.hefty@...el.com, hal.rosenstock@...il.com,
fubar@...ibm.com, andy@...yhouse.net, divy@...lsio.com,
jitendra.kalsaria@...gic.com, sony.chacko@...gic.com,
linux-driver@...gic.com, kaber@...sh.net, ursula.braun@...ibm.com,
blaschka@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com, joe@...ches.com,
amwang@...hat.com, nhorman@...driver.com,
john.r.fastabend@...el.com, pablo@...filter.org
Subject: Re: [patch net-next 01/15] net: introduce upper device lists
On Sun, 30 Dec 2012 12:58:08 +0100
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> wrote:
> This lists are supposed to serve for storing pointers to all upper devices.
> Eventually it will replace dev->master pointer which is used for
> bonding, bridge, team but it cannot be used for vlan, macvlan where
> there might be multiple upper present. In case the upper link is
> replacement for dev->master, it is marked with "master" flag.
>
> New upper device list resolves this limitation. Also, the information
> stored in lists is used for preventing looping setups like
> "bond->somethingelse->samebond"
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
I like the concept of knowing the topology of layered network devices.
The name "upper device lists" is a little confusing to me.
Also, the amount of additional data structures and book keeping
seems more than needed; but not sure how to reduce it down to the
least code.
For simple case of detecting loops, just using existing master
pointer is sufficient.
ethernet --> bonding --> bridge --+
^ |
| |
+-----------------+
This is the simple case of detecting if singularly linked list
is a loop.
The only device where multiple upper devices is possible seems
to be macvlan. Could the special case code be limited to there?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists