[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2212516.GkG3xP33yG@linux-5eaq.site>
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 23:16:31 +0100
From: Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
To: Dan Williams <dcbw@...hat.com>
Cc: Elina Pasheva <epasheva@...rrawireless.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
Rory Filer <rfiler@...rrawireless.com>,
Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] usbnet: allow status interrupt URB to always be active
On Friday 04 January 2013 10:48:16 Dan Williams wrote:
> Some drivers (ex sierra_net) need the status interrupt URB
> active even when the device is closed, because they receive
> custom indications from firmware. Allow sub-drivers to set
> a flag that submits the status interrupt URB on probe and
> keeps the URB alive over device open/close. The URB is still
> killed/re-submitted for suspend/resume, as before.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dcbw@...hat.com>
> ---
> Oliver: alternatively, is there a problem with *always*
> submitting the interrupt URB, and then simply not calling
> the subdriver's .status function when the netdev is
> closed? That would be a much simpler patch.
That is quite radical. We have no idea what a device
does when we do not react to a status update. I would
much prefer to not take the risk.
Besides, we don't use bandwidth if we don't have to.
Regards
Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists