[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130105190508.GE4031@order.stressinduktion.org>
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 20:05:08 +0100
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: make sysctl_tcp_ecn namespace aware
On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 11:00:05AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> Rather than passing sysctl_tcp_ecn around as a parameter, I think it
> would be clearer and more efficient to make the ECN functions namespace
> aware.
>
> Instead of:
> > @@ -728,7 +728,8 @@ struct tcp_skb_cb {
> > * notifications, we disable TCP ECN negociation.
> > */
> > static inline void
> > -TCP_ECN_create_request(struct request_sock *req, const struct sk_buff *skb)
> > +TCP_ECN_create_request(struct request_sock *req, const struct sk_buff *skb,
> > + int sysctl_tcp_ecn)
> > {
> > const struct tcphdr *th = tcp_hdr(skb);
> >
>
> @@ -731,8 +730,9 @@ static inline void
> TCP_ECN_create_request(struct request_sock *req, const struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> const struct tcphdr *th = tcp_hdr(skb);
> -
> - if (sysctl_tcp_ecn && th->ece && th->cwr &&
> +
> + if (sock_net(req->sk)->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_ecn &&
> + th->ece && th->cwr &&
> INET_ECN_is_not_ect(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->ip_dsfield))
> inet_rsk(req)->ecn_ok = 1;
Having a quick look, I think req->sk is not initialized at that moment, but
I'll verify later.
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists