| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <50EAFA2A.3000200@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 11:39:06 -0500 From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com> To: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com> CC: Florian Fainelli <florian@...nwrt.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sctp: Change defaults on cookie hmac selection On 01/07/2013 10:46 AM, Neil Horman wrote: > On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 10:32:01AM -0500, Vlad Yasevich wrote: >> On 01/07/2013 09:49 AM, Neil Horman wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 02:25:39PM +0100, Florian Fainelli wrote: >>>> Hello Neil, >>>> >>>> Le 12/15/12 02:22, Neil Horman a écrit : >>>>> Recently I posted commit 3c68198e75 which made selection of the cookie hmac >>>>> algorithm selectable. This is all well and good, but Linus noted that it >>>>> changes the default config: >>>>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=135536629004808&w=2 >>>>> >>>>> I've modified the sctp Kconfig file to reflect the recommended way of making >>>>> this choice, using the thermal driver example specified, and brought the >>>>> defaults back into line with the way they were prior to my origional patch >>>>> >>>>> Also, on Linus' suggestion, re-adding ability to select default 'none' hmac >>>>> algorithm, so we don't needlessly bloat the kernel by forcing a non-none >>>>> default. This also led me to note that we won't honor the default none >>>>> condition properly because of how sctp_net_init is encoded. Fix that up as >>>>> well. >>>>> >>>>> Tested by myself (allbeit fairly quickly). All configuration combinations seems >>>>> to work soundly. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com> >>>>> CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> >>>>> CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> >>>>> CC: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com> >>>>> CC: linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org >>>>> --- >>>>> net/sctp/Kconfig | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-- >>>>> net/sctp/protocol.c | 4 ++-- >>>>> 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/net/sctp/Kconfig b/net/sctp/Kconfig >>>>> index a9edd2e..c262106 100644 >>>>> --- a/net/sctp/Kconfig >>>>> +++ b/net/sctp/Kconfig >>>>> @@ -66,12 +66,36 @@ config SCTP_DBG_OBJCNT >>>>> 'cat /proc/net/sctp/sctp_dbg_objcnt' >>>>> >>>>> If unsure, say N >>>>> +choice >>>>> + prompt "Default SCTP cookie HMAC encoding" >>>>> + default SCTP_COOKIE_HMAC_MD5 >>>> >>>> Should not this be SCTP_DEFAULT_COOKIE_HMAC_MD5? I just tried to >>>> update to 3.8-rc2, and I usually build my kernel-headers with: >>>> >>>> yes '' | ARCH=foo make oldconfig >>>> >>>> and this just kept asking me for this config symbol because none >>>> could be provided. >>>> -- >>>> Florian >>>> >>> >>> No, the config mechanism is setup to offer the user the ability to choose a >>> default cookie hmac, alg, then optionally select any other hmac algs you would >>> like to be made available (in the event you want to change the default at run >>> time). When you select the default, it eables (via the select directive), the >>> corresponding SCTP_COOKIE_HMAC_* config option, which is used in the build, and >>> then prompts for the remaining values. >>> >> >> Neil >> >> Actually, I think it should be as Florian suggests. The default >> value of the choice should be one of the values defined as part of >> the choice (the SCTP_DEFAULT_COOKIE_*). Turning on appropriate >> default would turn on appropriate cookie config >> (SCTP_COOKIE_HMAC_*). >> > I absolutely disagree. > >> Would that save all the config trouble? >> > Yes, it would fix it as Florian has noted, but at the cost of silently modifying > what the default hmac config vaule is. If you've expressly disabled > SCTP_COOKIE_HMAC_MD5, and then blindly take the default choice in the > SCTP_DEFAULT_COOKIE selection option (the default default as it were), using the > approach your suggesting, then that will silently enable SCTP_COOKIE_HMAC_MD5 > again, which may not be expected by users. If you expressly have a config > option disabled in an old configuration, we should leave it there. GACK. Just reproduced this and I really don't like this infinite loop of choice prompts. That's a horrible bug and we need to fix this. I don't think overriding the value is that big of a deal, especially considering that this is exactly what 'make menuconfig' and other graphical configs will do. If I start with: CONFIG_IP_SCTP=m CONFIG_NET_SCTPPROBE=m # CONFIG_SCTP_DBG_MSG is not set # CONFIG_SCTP_DBG_OBJCNT is not set # CONFIG_SCTP_HMAC_NONE is not set CONFIG_SCTP_HMAC_SHA1=y # CONFIG_SCTP_HMAC_MD5 is not set then run: yes "" | make oldconfig I get an infinite loop. If I run "make menuconfig", I get: CONFIG_IP_SCTP=m CONFIG_NET_SCTPPROBE=m # CONFIG_SCTP_DBG_MSG is not set # CONFIG_SCTP_DBG_OBJCNT is not set CONFIG_SCTP_DEFAULT_COOKIE_HMAC_MD5=y # CONFIG_SCTP_DEFAULT_COOKIE_HMAC_SHA1 is not set # CONFIG_SCTP_DEFAULT_COOKIE_HMAC_NONE is not set CONFIG_SCTP_COOKIE_HMAC_MD5=y # CONFIG_SCTP_COOKIE_HMAC_SHA1 is not set Note, that SHA1 is now overridden with MD5. If I change the value of the default choice in Kconfig, the behavior between oldconfig and menuconfig is the same. -vlad > > We're doing the right thing now, IMO. When presented with a conflictly set > of configuration options, the config utilty is (repeatedly) prompting us to > resolve them. That seems like a much more reasonable approach to this, than > silently changing pre-existing options so people can do the equivalent of just > blindly pressing enter through the config process (which is all yes "" | make > oldconfig is). > > This is a momentary hiccup, corrected by taking 30 seconds to make a manual > config change (or by taking a second to understand what the config utility is > tell us by prompting for a default choice repeatedly). Theres nothing to fix > here. > > Neil > >> -vlad >> >>> Neil >>> >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists