[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130108.174601.1788895671912734725.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 17:46:01 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: dtor@...are.com
Cc: pv-drivers@...are.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [Pv-drivers] [PATCH 0/6] VSOCK for Linux upstreaming
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...are.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 17:41:44 -0800
> On Tuesday, January 08, 2013 05:30:56 PM David Miller wrote:
>> From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
>> Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 16:21:10 -0800
>>
>> > On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 03:59:08PM -0800, George Zhang wrote:
>> >> * * *
>> >>
>> >> This series of VSOCK linux upstreaming patches include latest udpate from
>> >> VMware to address Greg's and all other's code review comments.
>> >
>> > Dave, you acked these patches a while ago,
>>
>> Really? I'd like to see where I did that.
>>
>> Instead, what I remember doing was deferring to the feedback these
>> folks received, stating that ideas that the virtio people had
>> mentioned should be considered instead.
>>
>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=135301515818462&w=2
>
> I believe Andy replied to Anthony's AF_VMCHANNEL post and the differences
> between the proposed solutions.
I'd much rather see a hypervisor neutral solution than a hypervisor
specific one which this certainly is.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists