[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130109.235738.467651533138068641.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 23:57:38 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: sgruszka@...hat.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
greearb@...delatech.com, bjorn@...k.no,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, bhutchings@...arflare.com,
mirqus@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: set default_ethtool_ops in register_netdevice
From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 16:38:51 +0100
> Since:
>
> commit 2c60db037034d27f8c636403355d52872da92f81
> Author: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> Date: Sun Sep 16 09:17:26 2012 +0000
>
> net: provide a default dev->ethtool_ops
>
> wireless core does not correctly assign ethtool_ops. In order to fix
> the problem, move assignement of default_ethtool_ops to
> register_netdevice(). This is safe because both register_netdevice()
> and dev_ethtool() are protected by RTNL lock.
>
> Patch is besed on hint of Michaİİ Mirosİİaw.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # 3.7+
> ---
> v1 -> v2: change order of default_ethtool_ops initialization to avoid
> the problem. Change the subject accordingly.
I don't understand this. Why is the assignment of default_ethtool_ops
at netdev allocation time not working? Is wireless really not using
alloc_netdev*()?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists