[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50EE9141.6020805@linux-ipv6.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 19:00:33 +0900
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
To: Romain KUNTZ <r.kuntz@...lavors.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andreas Hofmeister <andi@...lax.com>,
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ipv6: fix the noflags test in addrconf_get_prefix_route
Romain KUNTZ wrote:
> From e7ece201c35615c44a3cfdc10ee28ad5a5878f41 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Romain Kuntz <r.kuntz@...lavors.com>
> Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 15:02:26 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] ipv6: fix the noflags test in addrconf_get_prefix_route
>
> The tests on the flags in addrconf_get_prefix_route() does no make
> much sense: the 'noflags' parameter contains the set of flags that
> must not match with the route flags, so the test must be done
> against 'noflags', and not against 'flags'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Romain Kuntz <r.kuntz@...lavors.com>
> ---
> net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> index 408cac4a..29ba4ff 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> @@ -1877,7 +1877,7 @@ static struct rt6_info *addrconf_get_prefix_route(const struct in6_addr *pfx,
> continue;
> if ((rt->rt6i_flags & flags) != flags)
> continue;
> - if ((noflags != 0) && ((rt->rt6i_flags & flags) != 0))
> + if ((rt->rt6i_flags & noflags) != 0)
> continue;
> dst_hold(&rt->dst);
> break;
>
Acked-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
--yoshfuji
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists