[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130110113108.GF13451@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 13:31:08 +0200
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] tun: avoid owner checks on IFF_ATTACH_QUEUE
At the moment, we check owner when we enable queue in tun.
This seems redundant and will break some valid uses
where fd is passed around: I think TUNSETOWNER is there
to prevent others from attaching to a persistent device not
owned by them. Here the fd is already attached,
enabling/disabling queue is more like read/write.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
---
Note: this is unrelated to Stefan's bugfix.
diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
index fbd106e..78e3225 100644
--- a/drivers/net/tun.c
+++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
@@ -1789,10 +1792,8 @@ static int tun_set_queue(struct file *file, struct ifreq *ifr)
tun = tfile->detached;
if (!tun)
ret = -EINVAL;
- else if (tun_not_capable(tun))
- ret = -EPERM;
else
ret = tun_attach(tun, file);
} else if (ifr->ifr_flags & IFF_DETACH_QUEUE) {
tun = rcu_dereference_protected(tfile->tun,
lockdep_rtnl_is_held());
--
MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists