[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50EF06DD.7070207@hp.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 10:22:21 -0800
From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
Christian Becker <c.becker@...viangames.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: tainted warnings with tcp splicing in 3.7.1
On 01/10/2013 08:20 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> I also want to thanks Rick, as the latest netperf has splice() support.
>
> Thanks Rick !
You are quite welcome - and thank you for helping me get it to actually
work :)
Those wishing to try it themselves should grab the top-of-trunk netperf
bits from http://www.netperf.org/svn/netperf2/trunk . The use of
splice() is gated by a test-specific -V option:
raj@...dy:~/netperf2_trunk/src$ ./netperf -t omni -- -d recv -V
OMNI Receive TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to
localhost.localdomain () port 0 AF_INET : copy avoidance : demo
Remote Local Remote Elapsed Throughput Throughput
Send Socket Recv Socket Send Time Units
Size Size Size (sec)
Final Final
1661688 4194304 16384 10.00 26103.14 10^6bits/s
You should see that "copy avoidance" appearing in the test banner. It
will also "take" for things like a migrated TCP_mumble test. For those
cases where you don't see a throughput change, enabling CPU utilization
measurement and looking at that and service demand should show a difference.
happy benchmarking,
rick jones
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists