netdev - Re: [PATCH 3.8-rc] tuntap: refuse to re-attach to different tun

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 11 Jan 2013 09:29:20 +0800
From:	Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	stefanha@...hat.com, mst@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.8-rc] tuntap: refuse to re-attach to different tun_struct

On 01/11/2013 06:39 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>
> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 08:59:48 +0100
>
>> Multiqueue tun devices support detaching a tun_file from its tun_struct
>> and re-attaching at a later point in time.  This allows users to disable
>> a specific queue temporarily.
>>
>> ioctl(TUNSETIFF) allows the user to specify the network interface to
>> attach by name.  This means the user can attempt to attach to interface
>> "B" after detaching from interface "A".
>>
>> The driver is not designed to support this so check we are re-attaching
>> to the right tun_struct.  Failure to do so may lead to oops.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>
> Applied.
Hi David:

Any chance that I can have a respin on this patch, there's still a bug
after this patch. Or I just can send a patch on top?

Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html