[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1357923819.2327.5.camel@joe-AO722>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 09:03:39 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@...el.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, gospo@...hat.com, sassmann@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [net-next 09/15] e1000e: resolve checkpatch PREFER_PR_LEVEL
warning
On Fri, 2013-01-11 at 02:23 -0800, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> WARNING: Prefer netdev_info(netdev, ... then dev_info(dev, ...
> then pr_info(... to printk(KERN_INFO ...
[]
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
[]
> @@ -4300,9 +4300,8 @@ static void e1000_print_link_info(struct e1000_adapter *adapter)
> u32 ctrl = er32(CTRL);
>
> /* Link status message must follow this format for user tools */
> - printk(KERN_INFO "e1000e: %s NIC Link is Up %d Mbps %s Duplex, Flow Control: %s\n",
> - adapter->netdev->name,
> - adapter->link_speed,
> + pr_info("e1000e: %s NIC Link is Up %d Mbps %s Duplex, Flow Control: %s\n",
> + adapter->netdev->name, adapter->link_speed,
Don't these changes break a user-space tool?
If not, please remove the comment above the pr_info()s
and remove the unnecessary e1000e: prefixes.
> @@ -4521,8 +4520,8 @@ static void e1000_watchdog_task(struct work_struct *work)
[]
> /* Link status message must follow this format */
> - printk(KERN_INFO "e1000e: %s NIC Link is Down\n",
> - adapter->netdev->name);
> + pr_info("e1000e: %s NIC Link is Down\n",
> + adapter->netdev->name);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists