[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <874nin1cc1.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 10:50:30 +1030
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: Sjur Brændeland <sjurbren@...il.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFCv2 00/12] Introduce host-side virtio queue and CAIF Virtio.
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com> writes:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:18:33AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com> writes:
>> > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 09:00:55PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> >> Not sure why vhost/net doesn't built a packet and feed it in
>> >> netif_rx_ni(). This is what tun seems to do, and with this code it
>> >> should be fairly optimal.
>> >
>> > Because we want to use NAPI.
>>
>> Not quite what I was asking; it was more a question of why we're using a
>> raw socket, when we trivially have a complete skb already which we
>> should be able to feed to Linux like any network packet.
>
> Oh for some reason I thought you were talking about virtio.
> I don't really understand what you are saying here - vhost
> actually calls out to tun to build and submit the skb.
Ah, the fd is tun? Seems a bit indirect; I wonder if there's room for
more optimization here...
Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists