| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 15:37:58 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
CC: kvm@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/2] vhost: handle polling errors
On 01/14/2013 02:57 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 10:59:02AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>> On 01/13/2013 07:10 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 11:04:32PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>>>> On 01/07/2013 10:55 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 12:38:17PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>>>>>> On 01/06/2013 09:22 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 03:18:38PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>>>>>>>> Polling errors were ignored by vhost/vhost_net, this may lead to crash when
>>>>>>>> trying to remove vhost from waitqueue when after the polling is failed. Solve
>>>>>>>> this problem by:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - checking the poll->wqh before trying to remove from waitqueue
>>>>>>>> - report an error when poll() returns a POLLERR in vhost_start_poll()
>>>>>>>> - report an error when vhost_start_poll() fails in
>>>>>>>> vhost_vring_ioctl()/vhost_net_set_backend() which is used to notify the
>>>>>>>> failure to userspace.
>>>>>>>> - report an error in the data path in vhost_net when meet polling errors.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> After those changes, we can safely drop the tx polling state in vhost_net since
>>>>>>>> it was replaced by the checking of poll->wqh.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> drivers/vhost/net.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++--------------------------------
>>>>>>>> drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 31 +++++++++++++++-----
>>>>>>>> drivers/vhost/vhost.h | 2 +-
>>>>>>>> 3 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c
>>>>>>>> index d10ad6f..125c1e5 100644
>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/vhost/net.c
>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c
>>>>>>>> @@ -64,20 +64,10 @@ enum {
>>>>>>>> VHOST_NET_VQ_MAX = 2,
>>>>>>>> };
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -enum vhost_net_poll_state {
>>>>>>>> - VHOST_NET_POLL_DISABLED = 0,
>>>>>>>> - VHOST_NET_POLL_STARTED = 1,
>>>>>>>> - VHOST_NET_POLL_STOPPED = 2,
>>>>>>>> -};
>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>> struct vhost_net {
>>>>>>>> struct vhost_dev dev;
>>>>>>>> struct vhost_virtqueue vqs[VHOST_NET_VQ_MAX];
>>>>>>>> struct vhost_poll poll[VHOST_NET_VQ_MAX];
>>>>>>>> - /* Tells us whether we are polling a socket for TX.
>>>>>>>> - * We only do this when socket buffer fills up.
>>>>>>>> - * Protected by tx vq lock. */
>>>>>>>> - enum vhost_net_poll_state tx_poll_state;
>>>>>>>> /* Number of TX recently submitted.
>>>>>>>> * Protected by tx vq lock. */
>>>>>>>> unsigned tx_packets;
>>>>>>>> @@ -155,24 +145,6 @@ static void copy_iovec_hdr(const struct iovec *from, struct iovec *to,
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -/* Caller must have TX VQ lock */
>>>>>>>> -static void tx_poll_stop(struct vhost_net *net)
>>>>>>>> -{
>>>>>>>> - if (likely(net->tx_poll_state != VHOST_NET_POLL_STARTED))
>>>>>>>> - return;
>>>>>>>> - vhost_poll_stop(net->poll + VHOST_NET_VQ_TX);
>>>>>>>> - net->tx_poll_state = VHOST_NET_POLL_STOPPED;
>>>>>>>> -}
>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>> -/* Caller must have TX VQ lock */
>>>>>>>> -static void tx_poll_start(struct vhost_net *net, struct socket *sock)
>>>>>>>> -{
>>>>>>>> - if (unlikely(net->tx_poll_state != VHOST_NET_POLL_STOPPED))
>>>>>>>> - return;
>>>>>>>> - vhost_poll_start(net->poll + VHOST_NET_VQ_TX, sock->file);
>>>>>>>> - net->tx_poll_state = VHOST_NET_POLL_STARTED;
>>>>>>>> -}
>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>> /* In case of DMA done not in order in lower device driver for some reason.
>>>>>>>> * upend_idx is used to track end of used idx, done_idx is used to track head
>>>>>>>> * of used idx. Once lower device DMA done contiguously, we will signal KVM
>>>>>>>> @@ -227,6 +199,7 @@ static void vhost_zerocopy_callback(struct ubuf_info *ubuf, bool success)
>>>>>>>> static void handle_tx(struct vhost_net *net)
>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>> struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = &net->dev.vqs[VHOST_NET_VQ_TX];
>>>>>>>> + struct vhost_poll *poll = net->poll + VHOST_NET_VQ_TX;
>>>>>>>> unsigned out, in, s;
>>>>>>>> int head;
>>>>>>>> struct msghdr msg = {
>>>>>>>> @@ -252,7 +225,8 @@ static void handle_tx(struct vhost_net *net)
>>>>>>>> wmem = atomic_read(&sock->sk->sk_wmem_alloc);
>>>>>>>> if (wmem >= sock->sk->sk_sndbuf) {
>>>>>>>> mutex_lock(&vq->mutex);
>>>>>>>> - tx_poll_start(net, sock);
>>>>>>>> + if (vhost_poll_start(poll, sock->file))
>>>>>>>> + vq_err(vq, "Fail to start TX polling\n");
>>>>>>> s/Fail/Failed/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A question though: how can this happen? Could you clarify please?
>>>>>>> Maybe we can find a way to prevent this error?
>>>>>> Two conditions I think this can happen:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1) a buggy userspace disable a queue through TUNSETQUEUE
>>>>>> 2) the net device were gone
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For 1, looks like we can delay the disabling until the refcnt goes to
>>>>>> zero. For 2 may needs more changes.
>>>>> I'd expect keeping a socket reference would prevent both issues.
>>>>> Doesn't it?
>>>> Doesn't work for 2 I think, the socket didn't hold a refcnt of the
>>>> device, so the device can go away at anytime. Although we can change
>>>> this, but it's the behaviour before multiqueue support.
>>> Hmm there's one scenario that does seem to
>>> trigger this: queue can get disabled
>>> and then poll fails.
>>>
>>> Is this the only issue?
>> Another one I think we can trigger is:
>>
>> - start vhost thread
>> - do ip link del link dev tap0 to delete the tap device
>>
>> In this case, the netdevice is unregistered but the file/socket still exist.
> Yes but in this case poll_wait is called so apparently no issue
> with existing code? We only have an issue if poll_wait is
> not called right?
Right.
> Maybe the simplest fix is to invoke poll_wait before
> checking if (!tun) ?
True, but we this depends on the assumption that each kind of backend
must make sure poll_wait() is called in .poll(). And we need to change
macvtap_poll() as well. And we'd better also pass those polling errors
to notify user about this wrong state.
>
>>>>>> Not sure it's worth to do this work,
>>>>>> maybe a warning is enough just like other failure.
>>>>> With other failures, you normally can correct the error then
>>>>> kick to have it restart. This is soomething thagt would not
>>>>> work here.
>>>> If userspace is wrote correctly, (e.g passing a fd with correct state)
>>>> it can also be corrected.
>>>>>>>> mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex);
>>>>>>>> return;
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>> @@ -261,7 +235,7 @@ static void handle_tx(struct vhost_net *net)
>>>>>>>> vhost_disable_notify(&net->dev, vq);
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> if (wmem < sock->sk->sk_sndbuf / 2)
>>>>>>>> - tx_poll_stop(net);
>>>>>>>> + vhost_poll_stop(poll);
>>>>>>>> hdr_size = vq->vhost_hlen;
>>>>>>>> zcopy = vq->ubufs;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> @@ -283,8 +257,10 @@ static void handle_tx(struct vhost_net *net)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> wmem = atomic_read(&sock->sk->sk_wmem_alloc);
>>>>>>>> if (wmem >= sock->sk->sk_sndbuf * 3 / 4) {
>>>>>>>> - tx_poll_start(net, sock);
>>>>>>>> - set_bit(SOCK_ASYNC_NOSPACE, &sock->flags);
>>>>>>>> + if (vhost_poll_start(poll, sock->file))
>>>>>>>> + vq_err(vq, "Fail to start TX polling\n");
>>>>>>>> + else
>>>>>>>> + set_bit(SOCK_ASYNC_NOSPACE, &sock->flags);
>>>>>>>> break;
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>> /* If more outstanding DMAs, queue the work.
>>>>>>>> @@ -294,8 +270,10 @@ static void handle_tx(struct vhost_net *net)
>>>>>>>> (vq->upend_idx - vq->done_idx) :
>>>>>>>> (vq->upend_idx + UIO_MAXIOV - vq->done_idx);
>>>>>>>> if (unlikely(num_pends > VHOST_MAX_PEND)) {
>>>>>>>> - tx_poll_start(net, sock);
>>>>>>>> - set_bit(SOCK_ASYNC_NOSPACE, &sock->flags);
>>>>>>>> + if (vhost_poll_start(poll, sock->file))
>>>>>>>> + vq_err(vq, "Fail to start TX polling\n");
>>>>>>>> + else
>>>>>>>> + set_bit(SOCK_ASYNC_NOSPACE, &sock->flags);
>>>>>>>> break;
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>> if (unlikely(vhost_enable_notify(&net->dev, vq))) {
>>>>>>>> @@ -360,7 +338,8 @@ static void handle_tx(struct vhost_net *net)
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>> vhost_discard_vq_desc(vq, 1);
>>>>>>>> if (err == -EAGAIN || err == -ENOBUFS)
>>>>>>>> - tx_poll_start(net, sock);
>>>>>>>> + if (vhost_poll_start(poll, sock->file))
>>>>>>>> + vq_err(vq, "Fail to start TX polling\n");
>>>>>>>> break;
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>> if (err != len)
>>>>>>>> @@ -623,7 +602,6 @@ static int vhost_net_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *f)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> vhost_poll_init(n->poll + VHOST_NET_VQ_TX, handle_tx_net, POLLOUT, dev);
>>>>>>>> vhost_poll_init(n->poll + VHOST_NET_VQ_RX, handle_rx_net, POLLIN, dev);
>>>>>>>> - n->tx_poll_state = VHOST_NET_POLL_DISABLED;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> f->private_data = n;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> @@ -633,29 +611,25 @@ static int vhost_net_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *f)
>>>>>>>> static void vhost_net_disable_vq(struct vhost_net *n,
>>>>>>>> struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>> + struct vhost_poll *poll = n->poll + (vq - n->vqs);
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> if (!vq->private_data)
>>>>>>>> return;
>>>>>>>> - if (vq == n->vqs + VHOST_NET_VQ_TX) {
>>>>>>>> - tx_poll_stop(n);
>>>>>>>> - n->tx_poll_state = VHOST_NET_POLL_DISABLED;
>>>>>>>> - } else
>>>>>>>> - vhost_poll_stop(n->poll + VHOST_NET_VQ_RX);
>>>>>>>> + vhost_poll_stop(poll);
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -static void vhost_net_enable_vq(struct vhost_net *n,
>>>>>>>> +static int vhost_net_enable_vq(struct vhost_net *n,
>>>>>>>> struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>> struct socket *sock;
>>>>>>>> + struct vhost_poll *poll = n->poll + (vq - n->vqs);
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> sock = rcu_dereference_protected(vq->private_data,
>>>>>>>> lockdep_is_held(&vq->mutex));
>>>>>>>> if (!sock)
>>>>>>>> - return;
>>>>>>>> - if (vq == n->vqs + VHOST_NET_VQ_TX) {
>>>>>>>> - n->tx_poll_state = VHOST_NET_POLL_STOPPED;
>>>>>>>> - tx_poll_start(n, sock);
>>>>>>>> - } else
>>>>>>>> - vhost_poll_start(n->poll + VHOST_NET_VQ_RX, sock->file);
>>>>>>>> + return 0;
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> + return vhost_poll_start(poll, sock->file);
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> static struct socket *vhost_net_stop_vq(struct vhost_net *n,
>>>>>>>> @@ -833,7 +807,9 @@ static long vhost_net_set_backend(struct vhost_net *n, unsigned index, int fd)
>>>>>>>> r = vhost_init_used(vq);
>>>>>>>> if (r)
>>>>>>>> goto err_used;
>>>>>>>> - vhost_net_enable_vq(n, vq);
>>>>>>>> + r = vhost_net_enable_vq(n, vq);
>>>>>>>> + if (r)
>>>>>>>> + goto err_used;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> oldubufs = vq->ubufs;
>>>>>>>> vq->ubufs = ubufs;
>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
>>>>>>>> index 34389f7..5c7a466 100644
>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
>>>>>>>> @@ -77,26 +77,41 @@ void vhost_poll_init(struct vhost_poll *poll, vhost_work_fn_t fn,
>>>>>>>> init_poll_funcptr(&poll->table, vhost_poll_func);
>>>>>>>> poll->mask = mask;
>>>>>>>> poll->dev = dev;
>>>>>>>> + poll->wqh = NULL;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> vhost_work_init(&poll->work, fn);
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +/* Stop polling a file. After this function returns, it becomes safe to drop the
>>>>>>>> + * file reference. You must also flush afterwards. */
>>>>>>>> +void vhost_poll_stop(struct vhost_poll *poll)
>>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>>> + if (poll->wqh) {
>>>>>>>> + remove_wait_queue(poll->wqh, &poll->wait);
>>>>>>>> + poll->wqh = NULL;
>>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>>> +}
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> /* Start polling a file. We add ourselves to file's wait queue. The caller must
>>>>>>>> * keep a reference to a file until after vhost_poll_stop is called. */
>>>>>>>> -void vhost_poll_start(struct vhost_poll *poll, struct file *file)
>>>>>>>> +int vhost_poll_start(struct vhost_poll *poll, struct file *file)
>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>> unsigned long mask;
>>>>>>>> + int ret = 0;
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> + if (poll->wqh)
>>>>>>>> + return -EBUSY;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think this should return success: we are already polling.
>>>>>>> Otherwise this would trigger a bug below I think.
>>>>>> Ok.
>>>>>>>> mask = file->f_op->poll(file, &poll->table);
>>>>>>>> if (mask)
>>>>>>>> vhost_poll_wakeup(&poll->wait, 0, 0, (void *)mask);
>>>>>>>> -}
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -/* Stop polling a file. After this function returns, it becomes safe to drop the
>>>>>>>> - * file reference. You must also flush afterwards. */
>>>>>>>> -void vhost_poll_stop(struct vhost_poll *poll)
>>>>>>>> -{
>>>>>>>> - remove_wait_queue(poll->wqh, &poll->wait);
>>>>>>>> + if (mask & POLLERR) {
>>>>>>>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>>>>>>>> + vhost_poll_stop(poll);
>>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> + return ret;
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> static bool vhost_work_seq_done(struct vhost_dev *dev, struct vhost_work *work,
>>>>>>>> @@ -792,7 +807,7 @@ long vhost_vring_ioctl(struct vhost_dev *d, int ioctl, void __user *argp)
>>>>>>>> fput(filep);
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> if (pollstart && vq->handle_kick)
>>>>>>>> - vhost_poll_start(&vq->poll, vq->kick);
>>>>>>>> + r = vhost_poll_start(&vq->poll, vq->kick);
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex);
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.h b/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
>>>>>>>> index 2639c58..17261e2 100644
>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
>>>>>>>> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ void vhost_work_queue(struct vhost_dev *dev, struct vhost_work *work);
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> void vhost_poll_init(struct vhost_poll *poll, vhost_work_fn_t fn,
>>>>>>>> unsigned long mask, struct vhost_dev *dev);
>>>>>>>> -void vhost_poll_start(struct vhost_poll *poll, struct file *file);
>>>>>>>> +int vhost_poll_start(struct vhost_poll *poll, struct file *file);
>>>>>>>> void vhost_poll_stop(struct vhost_poll *poll);
>>>>>>>> void vhost_poll_flush(struct vhost_poll *poll);
>>>>>>>> void vhost_poll_queue(struct vhost_poll *poll);
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> 1.7.1
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
>>>>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>>>>>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>>> --
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
>>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>>>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists