[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50F6521F.4020706@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 15:09:19 +0800
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC(v2) net-next 13/13] ipv6: Complete neighbour entry removal
from dst_entry.
On 01/16/2013 12:46 AM, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki wrote:
> +#if 0
> if (rt->n && rt->n->dev == dev) {
> rt->n->dev = loopback_dev;
> dev_hold(loopback_dev);
> dev_put(dev);
> }
> +#endif
Why commenting this out instead of removing it? As rt->n is totally
removed, how possible could we reuse this code in future?
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists